Abstract
Background: Although low-energy ESWT is widely used in a
variety of soft tissue disorders no precise algorithm has been
accepted in the clinical practice. The application of a new
generation (pneumatic) device in patients is not characterized
yet.
Methods: A group of 24 patients with soft tissue chronic
disorders have attended our controlled prospective pilot study.
The main outcome measure was based on the patient’s subjective
assessment of pain by means of Visual Analog Scale (VAS) early
after ESWT.
Results: Early results of treatment by ESWT are regarded
as good and significant. These results of treatment do not
depend on the patient’s age and the duration of symptoms.
Conclusion: ESWT emitted by the new generation
(pneumatic) device seems to be an effective, alternative,
analgetic measure which may be applied as a noninvasive
therapeutic method in some soft tissue chronic disorders. ESWT
needs further randomised controlled clinical trials.
Key words: extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), soft
tissue disorders, visual analog scale (VAS)
J.Orthopaedics 2005;2(6)e3
Introduction:
ESWT is a
well-known method which was first introduced in the treatment of
renal calculi about three decades ago (1). Later ESWT was also
used in the treatment of delayed bone unions and pseudoarthroses
(1). Nowadays it has become an alternative method in the
management of some soft tissue complaints such as tendonitis of
the rotator cuff, tennis elbow, plantar fascitis and others (2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7).
A vast
application of this method was possible due to the introduction
of a new generation of devices. In our clinical trial a
pneumatic ESWT device has been used.
Detailed
indications, contraindications and technical parameters of ESWT
in soft tissue complaints treatment are not established yet (2,
3, 4, 5, 6, 7). The aim of the study is to present our own
preliminary experience with the new ESWT pneumatic device and to
assess early results of its application in the treatment of
chronic soft tissue disorders by means of Visual Analog Scale
(VAS), the evaluation of correlation concerning patients’ age,
the duration of symptoms and early results of ESWT.
Material and Methods :
The
inclusion criteria were major complaints of the patients who had
been treated conservatively for at least six months with no
positive result.
In total 28
patients were included of which half were females. The mean age
of whole group was 50.6 years (SD=12.1). The mean age of males
and females were, respectively 50.2 years (SD=15.2) and 51.1
(SD=8.6).
We
recruited adult patients with the following soft tissue
disorders plantar fascitis (N=6), tendonitis of the rotator cuff
(N=9), tennis elbow (N=5), patella tip syndrome (N=4), tibial
margin syndrome (N=2), peroneal muscles syndrome (N=1) and
achillodynia (N=1). The patients suffer of chronic pain in above
mentioned areas for a mean time 29.3 months.
Any
evidence of local inflammation or infection, local arthritis,
neurological disorder, pregnancy, tumor, cardiac pacemaker or
anticoagulant therapy excluded participation in the study.
We have
used a standardized survey in order to evaluate patient’s status
before implementation of ESWT treatment. This survey included:
personal data of the patient, an evaluation of a disease, a
precise anatomical localization of pain, former treatment and
additional diagnostic measures (x-ray, CT, NMR).
All
patients had been previously treated unsuccessfully. Twenty six
of them (92.9 %) had been given medication (mostly NSAID’s),
most of them twice a day. Over half of the subjects (53.6%) have
been subdued to physiotherapy. Six (21.4%) had been given
injections of steroids.
Extracorporeal shock waves were applied by a new generation,
pneumatic device (Swiss DolorClast; EMS, Nyon, Switzerland).
Common ultrasound gel was used as a contact medium between the
applicator (Æ=15mm)
and the skin at the point of the most intensive pain. Energy
flux density – 0,16 mJ/mm2 (2,5 bar).
All the
patients received during the first session 500 shock waves and
then in the two sessions 2000 shock waves at 3 days intervals.
All the patients completed visual analog score (VAS) in which 0
mm was no pain and 100 mm the worst imaginable pain before each
ESWT session.
After being
informed of ESWT principles each patient signed a consent form.
A group of
24 patients had completed three ESWT sessions and were evaluated
and considered for the statistical analysis of an early results:
plantar fascitis (N=6), tendonitis of the rotator cuff (N=8),
tennis elbow (N=3), patella tip syndrome (N=3), tibial margin
syndrome (N=2), peroneal muscles syndrome (N=1) and achillodynia
(N=1). The mean age of this group was 50.5 years (SD=11.8). One
patient withdrew after the first session because she could not
tolerate the therapy, one for an unknown reason. Two subjects
did not attain final session for unknown reason. A group of 15
patients were subdued to the assessment by means of VAS after
six months.
A
comparison of the pain levels measured by means of VAS was
evaluated by ANOVA and Scheffe tests (post-hoc assessment). For
each patient a relative and positive change of VAS was measured.
In order to evaluate a dependency between the patient’s age,
duration of symptoms and the results of the ESWT the
imparametric Spearman’s test was used. A level of p<0,05 was
accepted as significant.
Results :
Values of VAS before the
treatment, after the first session and after the second session
are shown in table 1 and 2, and in figure 1. A significant
decrease of VAS was observed after every session (p<0.001).
Tab. 1:
Values of VAS before the sessions (VAS1), after
the first (VAS2) and the second session (VAS3)
|
N |
mean |
SD |
min. |
median |
max. |
VAS1 |
24 |
47.92 |
19.14 |
11.00 |
46.00 |
81.00 |
VAS2 |
24 |
37.83 |
18.28 |
8.00 |
40.00 |
74.00 |
VAS3 |
24 |
27.37 |
18.09 |
0.00 |
27.00 |
75.00 |
Fig. 1:
Values of VAS before the sessions (VAS1), after the first (VAS2)
and the second session (VAS3).

Tab. 2:
Relative and positive changes of VAS
|
N |
mean |
SD |
min. |
median |
max. |
DELTA13 |
24 |
20.54 |
16.02 |
- 8.00 |
19.00 |
61.00 |
DELTA13% |
24 |
42.50 |
28.56 |
- 13.11 |
42.22 |
100.00 |
There was no correlation
between patient’s age and the result of analgetic effect
measured by relative and positive method (Rs=0,1; p>0,05)
Fig. 2:
Relation between positive changes of VAS and patient’s age.

Fig. 3:
Relation between relative changes of VAS and patient’s age

There was no correlation
between the duration of symptoms and the result of treatment
measured by relative (Rs= - 0,1) and positive (Rs= - 0,2)
method; p>0,05)
Fig. 4:
Positive change of VAS in relation to the duration of symptoms

Fig. 5:
Relative change of VAS in relation to the duration of symptoms

At six months 15 out of 24
patients were assessed by means of VAS. The mean positive value
of VAS was 22.7 with SD=19.7 in comparison with the mean initial
values of VAS 47.9 with SD=19.1.
Discussion :
In a large
number of reports describing the role of ESWT in the treatment
of soft tissue disorders the data concerning inclusion criteria,
methods of study, parameters of shock-wave as well as
evaluating the outcome vary considerably. In a majority of
studies electrohydraulic or electromagnetic shock waves
generators were used (4, 6). Our paper concerns the new
generation device which due to its mobility may be used on the
outpatient clinic basis. The main advantage of this new device
is a size of the cap which enables a very precise application
shock wave of energy. The point of application was established
according to the clinical assessment as the most painful point
during palpation. Other methods of focusing were based on X-ray,
NMR and CT. As a method of assessment of the treatment VAS was
used, which because of its popularity seems to enable the
comparison of our results with other studies (8, 9, 10). The
lack of correlation of the results of treatment measured by
means of VAS with the patient’s age and the duration of
symptoms in the early stage seems to confirm some instant
effects of ESWT on soft tissues, especially on peripheral
neurons.
We are
aware of the fact that our studied group of patients is very
heterogeneous, there is no control group and our assessment of
results is very early, we have decided to publish our paper
because it is one of the first studies with the new generation
(pneumatic) device and early beneficial effects of ESWT are
very encouraging. We plan to enlarge our group in the next
projects and start randomized studies.
On the
basis of our preliminary study it seems that ESWT therapy in
pattern of three sessions with respectively 500, 2000 and 2000
impulses appeared to be a useful, noninvasive method in reducing
pain symptoms in patients with various soft tissue complaints
with negligible side effects. The results of therapy are very
good while measured by means of relative and positive VAS scale
both in early post ESWT stage and in the later period (after six
months).
Reference :
1. Haupt G.
Use of extracorporeal shock waves in the treatment of
pseudoarthrosis, tendinopathy and other orthopaedic diseases. J
Urol 1997; 158: 4-11.
2.Loew m, Deacke W, Kusnierczak D,
Ranmanzadeh M, Ewerbeck V. Shock-wave therapy is effective for
chronic calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg
(Br) 1999; 81-B: 863-7.
3. Rompe JD, Hopf C, Kullmer K, et al.
Low energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy for persistent
tennis elbow. Int Orthop 1996; 20: 23-7.
4. Rompe JD, Hopf C, Kullmer K, et al.
Analgesic effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on chronic
tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999; 78-B: 233-7.
5. Speed CA, Richards C, Nichols D,
Burbet S, Wies JT. Extracorporeal shock-waves therapy for
tendonitis of the rotator cuff – a double-blind, randomized,
controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002; 84-B: 509-12.
6. Speed CA. Extracorporeal shock-waves
therapy in the management of chronic soft-tissue conditions. J
Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2004; 86: 165-171.
7. Crowther MAA, Bannister GC, Huma H,
Rooker GD. A prospective, randomized study to compare
extracorporeal shock-wave therapy and injection of steroid for
the treatment of tennis elbow. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002;
84-B: 678-9.
8. Miller GA. he magical number seven,
plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity processing
information. Psychological Review 1956; 63: 81-97.
9. Munshi J. A method for constructing
Likert Scales. Researcg Report. Sonoma State University, CA.
10. Thomee R, Grimby G, Wright BD,
Linacre JM. Rash analysis of Visual analog Scale measurements
before and after tretment of patellofemral pain syndrome in
women. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitaion Medicine 1995; 27:
145-151.
|